MOUNT RAINIER
GEOLOGY & WEATHER
Hello guest! [ Log In ]
Welcome to morageology.com!
Welcome to
morageology.com
Use this bar to navigate the site
Good Morning!
Thursday, August 28, 2025
Today is day 240 of 2025 and
day 332 of Water Year 2025
Welcome to morageology.com! This site is an externally-accessible clearing house of static, real-time, non-real-time, and archived Mount Rainier geologic and geomorphic data used for geohazard awareness and mitigation. All data provided on this site are publicly-accessible non-sensitive scientific information collected by geologists at Mount Rainier National Park. Individual datasets are provided here for informational use only and are not guaranteed to be accurate or final versions - all data should be considered provisional unless otherwise noted.
TODAY'S DEBRIS FLOW HAZARD
10-DAY FORECAST TREND:
LLLHHHHLLL
LATEST PARADISE WEATHER
As of: 08/28/2025 10:00 AM

60.2° F
Wind: SW (223°) @ 3 G 8 mph
Snow Depth: 4 in (0% of normal)
24-hour Precip: 0.06 in

[ Observation | Forecast ]
LATEST LONGMIRE WEATHER
As of: 08/28/2025 11:02 AM

70° F
Snow Depth: -39331 in (0% of normal)
24-hour Precip: 0.03 in

[ Observation | Forecast ]
WINDY.COM PRECIPITATION RADAR
MOUNT RAINIER VICINITY
FORECASTED SNOW PACK
AT PARADISE (5,400')
[ More Info ]
Bank erosion on Tahoma Creek during the August 2015 debris flow (From a photo by Scott Beason on 08/13/2015)
LATEST EARTHQUAKES:
Earthquakes in the last 30 days near Mount Rainier
:
81

LAST 5 EARTHQUAKES:

  1. Wed, Aug 27, 2025, 16:35:08 GMT
    1 day 1 hour 36 minutes 56 seconds ago
    1.808 km (1.123 mi) NW of summit
    Magnitude: 0.3
    Depth -1.8 km (-1.1 mi)
    View More Info

  2. Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 19:13:18 GMT
    2 days 22 hours 58 minutes 46 seconds ago
    18.633 km (11.578 mi) SW of summit
    Magnitude: 0.7
    Depth 0.2 km (0.1 mi)
    View More Info

  3. Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 14:24:00 GMT
    3 days 3 hours 48 minutes 4 seconds ago
    0.513 km (0.319 mi) ENE of summit
    Magnitude: 0.3
    Depth -2.4 km (-1.5 mi)
    View More Info

  4. Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 07:35:49 GMT
    3 days 10 hours 36 minutes 15 seconds ago
    17.608 km (10.941 mi) SW of summit
    Magnitude: 0.6
    Depth 8.4 km (5.2 mi)
    View More Info

  5. Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 05:19:30 GMT
    3 days 12 hours 52 minutes 33 seconds ago
    11.302 km (7.023 mi) W of summit
    Magnitude: 0.5
    Depth 9.5 km (5.9 mi)
    View More Info

MISC:
Currently, this site has approximately
29,593,322
total data points in its database!
 
1 RANDOM PUBLICATION AND THE 5 LATEST PUBLICATIONS ADDED TO THE DATABASE:
  1. Beason (2011) Floodplains statement of findings: Carbon River area access management plan
    This Statement of Findings (SOF) was proposed as part of the Carbon River Area Access Management Environmental Assessment (EA). The Carbon River Road corridor (FIGURE 1) was originally constructed in the early 1920s and has historically been an important cultural resource to the region, providing access to a uniquely wet habitat on Mount Rainier National Park's northwest side. The road corridor has also been classified in the National Register of Historic Places as part of the Mount Rainier National Historic Landmark District (NHLD). Additionally, vast tracts of designated wilderness are accessible from the northwest side of the park along the roadway. The goal of the Carbon River Road Area Access Management plan is to preserve year-round sustainable public access to the northwest corner of the Carbon River Valley. Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management) requires the National Park Service (NPS) to evaluate likely impacts of actions in floodplains. NPS Directors Order #77-2 (Floodplain Management) provide policy and procedural guidance for complying with these orders. This SOF documents compliance with these orders. The Carbon River's headwaters are at the Carbon Glacier, the lowest elevation alpine glacier in the continental United States at approximately 3,500 feet (1,067 meters) above sea level (ASL). The Carbon River then flows north and west to the park boundary at 1,750 feet (533 meters) ASL. The Carbon Glacier begins its downward movement from near the summit of Mount Rainier at Liberty Cap, approximately 14,112 feet (4,301 meters). Along the way, the glacier scrapes and scours the volcanically-formed andesite rock below and adjacent to the glacier. The glacier acts as a giant conveyor belt and carries this rock and debris downstream to the headwaters of the Carbon River, for the river to carry out of the park. The river flows as a braided stream through a wide glacially-formed valley, constantly changing its braids and bars as sediment and water discharge fluctuate. Over time and owing to the river's exceedingly large sediment source, the riverbed is rising, or aggrading, as more sediment is provided to the river than can be conveyed out of the system. The Carbon River has historically aggraded up to 0.559 feet/year (0.170 meters/year) in a period between 1915 and 1971; or raising a total of 31.329 feet (9.549 meters) in 56 years (Beason, 2006). The Carbon River's 52.023 square mile (134.739 square kilometer) drainage basin at the park entrance receives 99.4 inches of rain and is covered with approximately 57.9% forest (TABLE 1). In November 2006, almost 18 inches of rain fell park-wide and lead to the single longest closure in the park's history (6 months between November 6, 2006-May 5, 2007; The Carbon River Road currently remains closed to public vehicle traffic at the Carbon River Entrance). The Carbon River valley was one of many areas in the park that received significant infrastructure damage. Between November 5, 2006 at 2:00 P.M. and November 7, 2006 at 2:15 P.M., 8.76 inches (22.25 cm) of precipitation was recorded at the USGS stream gauge on the Carbon River near Fairfax, WA (USGS Gauge #12094000). Flood stage of 13.5 feet (4.1 meters) was recorded at the gauge around noon on November 6th and the stream gage reached its highest recorded gauge height of 16.93 feet (5.16 meters) about six hours later. The flood significantly damaged the Carbon River Road, especially near Falls Creek (2,600 linear feet; 792 meters) and just before Ipsut Creek Campground (1,350 linear feet; 411 meters). In these locations, the road was washed away and replaced with a gully approximately 6-10 feet (2-3 meters) deep. Also, one lane of the Carbon River Road was washed away in two locations and both lanes were removed in one location between the Green Lake Trailhead and just before the Ipsut Creek Campground. Low recurrence interval (approximately 15-year) floods since 2006 have caused more damage to both the roadway and park infrastructure, mainly the loss of a structure by bank erosion at the Carbon River maintenance area. ENTRIX (2008) have shown that there may be an increase in the frequency and intensity of flood events as recorded by United States Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauges near the park. For instance, on the Carbon River at Fairfax, WA, the 100-year flood during the period of record from 1930-1977 now has a recurrence interval closer to 70 years when compared with the entire period of record (1930-2006) (FIGURE 2). Therefore, ENTRIX (2008) states that design conditions are changing and larger, more intense floods should be anticipated. On the Nisqually River, on the park's southwest side, there were no 10-year recurrence interval floods that occurred before 1970. Since then, there have been 6, including two events with recurrence intervals greater than 50 years. The general trend for the Nisqually River and Carbon River is an increase in the size of annual peak flows since the period of record began in 1940 and 1930, respectively. According to research by the University of Washington Climate Impacts Group (UW CIG), it is anticipated that by 2080, average yearly temperatures in the Washington Cascades region will be approximately 5.9°F warmer with an overall increase in precipitation of about 1-5%. Most of the anticipated increases in temperature will be between October and January (Mote, personal communication, 2008). The trend is for dryer summers and wetter winters, which is significant in that the largest and most destructive floods occur in the late fall during the period of record at both the Nisqually and Carbon Rivers. The Carbon River valley has had a long history of flooding since the establishment of the Carbon River Road. Large floods in 1990, 1996 and 2006 caused major damage to the roadway (the second, third and largest floods on record since 1930, respectively) (FIGURE 3). Following the 1996 flood, Mount Rainier National Park spent approximately $787,000 on a repair to the road. Two medium-size floods five weeks later destroyed the recently-repaired sections of roadway, washing out a 1,200 foot (366 meter) section of roadway to a depth of about 2-3 feet (0.6-1.0 meters). Even low recurrence interval floods have historically caused damage to the roadway and associated park infrastructure near the river (FIGURE 4). The Mount Rainier General Management Plan (GMP) signed in 2002 stated that the park would no longer maintain the Carbon River Road after the next major washout. The GMP did not define what a "major washout" of the road would be but under the guidance of the GMP, Mount Rainier National Park is not considering repairing and reopening the entire road corridor in its previous condition as part of the current EA.
  2. Ring (2025) Exploring thermal occupancy between bull trout and brook trout in glacial headwaters
    Cold, glacially influenced headwater streams are recognized as critical thermal refugia for cold-water fish species such as bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), which are highly sensitive to warming temperatures and face significant threats from climate change and non-native species. The cold waters of glacial streams not only provide essential thermal conditions for bull trout but may also exclude non-native species like brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) that compete with or displace bull trout. My study assesses the distribution of bull and brook trout in two glacial headwater rivers within Mount Rainier National Park, an area that includes federally designated critical habitat for bull trout under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Using environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and spatial stream network modeling (SSNM), I examined the relationship between fish presence and water temperature to understand thermal occupancy within glacial headwaters. Results showed that bull trout were widely distributed across the study site and detected at temperatures as low as 3 °C. Brook trout were concentrated in the warmest areas of the study area, being most prevalent between 6 and 8 °C, with the probability of their presence increasing as temperatures increased. Brook trout were nonetheless observed at temperatures as low as 4.25°C, which indicates a lower thermal tolerance than previously documented and calls into question the idea that temperature is a limiting factor for their distribution. My findings present evidence that brook trout may be more tolerant of cold stream temperatures than previously thought, and low stream temperatures may not be as strong of a barrier to invasion. Greater understanding of thermal occupancy of bull trout and brook trout in glacial headwaters is necessary to inform management strategies to mitigate the risk of bull trout extirpation in these vulnerable ecosystems.
  3. Field et al. (2025) Best practices for managing bank erosion within the National Park Service and National Wild and Scenic River System
    Riverbank erosion is a natural process that occurs as rivers adjust to disturbance events and to changes in water and sediment delivery over time. The resulting lateral movement of river channels is fundamental to building complex, dynamic, and resilient landscapes. In this sense, bank erosion is crucial to creating healthy rivers and should be preserved whenever possible. However, river managers may deem protection from bank erosion necessary if bank retreat threatens infrastructure, developed land, or other valuable natural and cultural resources. The National Park Service manages over 220,000 miles of rivers, approximately 3,750 of which are part of the National Wild and Scenic River System, encompassing various climatic, geological, watershed, and land use settings. These rivers have unique protections granted under National Park Service policies and the Wild and Scenic River Act, which require any action taken to mitigate bank erosion must minimize impacts to natural processes and river health. This document provides river managers with guidance and tools to ensure that bank erosion management aligns with the protections granted to Wild and Scenic Rivers and rivers managed by the National Park Service. River managers should reference this document during the project conceptual design phase to steer bank erosion management practices toward techniques that maintain the ecological and geomorphic functions of rivers. When evaluating a bank erosion issue, managers are encouraged to determine if erosion can be allowed to continue unimpeded or if offsite measures can be undertaken to slow the rate of bank retreat. A variety of surface treatments and flow deflection treatments are described for situations in which on-site bank protection is deemed necessary. Deformable treatments and those using organic materials, such as live vegetation or logs, are generally favored over those using inert materials, such as concrete and rock riprap.
  4. Pang et al. (2025) Long-lived partial melt beneath Cascade Range volcanoes
    Quantitative estimates of magma storage are fundamental to evaluating volcanic dynamics and hazards. Yet our understanding of subvolcanic magmatic plumbing systems and their variability remains limited. There is ongoing debate regarding the ephemerality of shallow magma storage and its volume relative to eruptive output, and so whether an upper-crustal magma body could be a sign of imminent eruption. Here we present seismic imaging of subvolcanic magmatic systems along the Cascade Range arc from systematically modelling the three-dimensional scattered wavefield of teleseismic body waves. This reveals compelling evidence of low-seismic-velocity bodies indicative of partial melt between 5 and 15 km depth beneath most Cascade Range volcanoes. The magma reservoirs beneath these volcanoes vary in depth, size and complexity, but upper-crustal magma bodies are widespread, irrespective of the eruptive flux or time since the last eruption of the associated volcano. This indicates that large volumes of melts can persist at shallow depth throughout eruption cycles beneath large volcanoes.
  5. Obryk et al. (2025) Utility of a swath laser rangefinder for characterizing mass movement flow depth and landslide initiation
    Mass movements such as debris flows and landslides are some of the deadliest and most destructive natural hazards occurring mostly in alpine and volcanic settings. With ever-growing populations located downslope from known debris flow channels, early warning systems can help prevent loss of life. Geophysical and technological advances have improved monitoring and detection capabilities in recent years; however, they can often be cost prohibitive and resource intensive, making them less accessible to disadvantaged populations. We tested and validated a readily available and cost-effective two-dimensional swath laser rangefinder in a controlled experimental setting against two independent flow-depth lasers. The swath laser successfully recorded cross-sectional changes in flow depth from four debris flows and a water-only flood, in addition to geomorphic changes associated with landslide initiation. The results suggest that a swath laser could be integrated into systems for debris flow detection and characterization of mass movements in natural settings, thus improving the ability to monitor these hazards.
  6. Gendaszek et al. (2025) Spatial stream network modeling of water temperature within the White River Basin, Mount Rainier National Park, Washington
    Water temperature is a primary control on the occurrence and distribution of fish and other ectothermic aquatic species. In the Pacific Northwest, cold-water species such as Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) have specific temperature requirements during different life stages that must be met to ensure the viability of their populations. Rivers draining Mount Rainier in western Washington, including the White River along its northern flank, support a number of cold-water fish populations, but the spatial distribution of water temperatures, particularly during late-summer baseflow during August and September, and the climatic, hydrologic, and physical processes regulating it are not well constrained. Spatial stream network (SSN) models, which are generalized linear models that incorporate streamwise spatial autocovariance structures, were fit to mean and 7-day average daily maximum water temperature for August and September for the White River Basin. The SSN models were calibrated using water temperature measurements collected in 2010 through 2020. The extent of the models included the White River and its tributaries upstream from its confluence with Silver Creek in Mount Rainier National Park, Washington. SSN models incorporated covariates hypothesized to represent the climatic, hydrologic, and physical processes that influence water temperature. SSN models were fit to the measured data and compared to generalized linear models that lacked spatial autocovariance structures. Statistically significant covariates within the best-fit models included the proportion of ice cover and forest cover within the basin, mean August air temperature, the proportion of consolidated geologic units, and snow-water equivalent. Statistical models that included spatial autocovariance structures had better predictive performance than those that did not. Additionally, models of mean August and September water temperature had better predictive performance than those of 7-day average daily maximum temperature in August and September. Predictions of the spatial distribution of water temperature were similar between August and September with a general warming in the downstream part of the mainstem White River compared to cooler water temperatures in the high-elevation headwater streams. The proportion of ice cover emerged as an inversely related significant covariate to both mean August and September water temperature because streams that receive glacial meltwater are colder than non-glaciated streams. Water temperatures of the upper White River increased downstream and are attributed to warming of water temperature from accumulated solar radiation and inflow of non-glaciated tributaries. Estimated water temperatures for the upper White River model are 3–4 degrees Celsius (°C) warmer for tributaries, but 1–2 °C cooler for the mainstem compared to the regional-scale model. Differences between the upper White River SSN model and the regional-scale NorWeST model are attributed to the fact that the upper White River SSN included water temperature observations specific to the upper White River, whereas water temperature observations from lower elevation streams and downstream from the Mount Rainer National Park boundary were used in the regional scale model.

View More Publications...

LATEST UPDATES AND SITE NEWS:
August 5, 2019 Tahoma Creek Debris Flow
Posted on Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 17:00 by Scott Beason. Updated on Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 17:00

The 32nd recorded debris flow in Tahoma Creek occurred on August 5, 2019, between 6:44 PM PDT (8/6/2019 01:55 UTC) - 8:10 PM PDT (8/6/2019 03:10 UTC), as observed on the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network's (PNSN) Emerald Ridge (RER) seismograph. The event began as a sudden and significant change in the primary outlet stream from the terminus of the South Tahoma Glacier. This change caused a surge of water to go over loose, steep and unconsolidated sediment-rich areas just downstream of the terminus. Debris flow deposits were observed approximately 4 miles downstream at the Tahoma Creek Trail trailhead (an area affectionally known in the park as 'barrel curve'). The event is still being investigated... a good photo set (with a few videos) is available here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mountrainiernps/sets/72157710161403356/. If you would like to view more information about the event, click here: http://www.morageology.com/geoEvent.php#145. If you were in the area of the South Tahoma Glacier or Tahoma Creek on the evening of August 5 and/or morning of August 6, and have any interesting observations, please send them to Scott Beason.

New Camp Schurman weather station added!
Posted on Tue, Jul 23, 2019, 14:17 by Scott Beason. Updated on Tue, Jul 23, 2019, 14:17

A new weather station has been added to morageology.com. Click the following link to see hourly data from Camp Schurman on the NE side of Mount Rainier's volcanic edifice at 9,500 feet: http://waterdata.morageology.com/station.php?g=MORAWXCS.

Longmire RSAM Down
Posted on Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 05:00 by Scott Beason. Updated on Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 05:00

The Longmire (LON) seismograph has been reporting ground vibrations from a construction project in the area near the seismograph. In order to prevent erroneous debris flow alerts, the RSAM (debris flow detection) analysis has been disabled. The system will be restored once the construction project has been completed.

LATEST CASCADES VOLCANO OBSERVATORY WEEKLY UPDATE:

CASCADES VOLCANO OBSERVATORY WEEKLY UPDATE
U.S. Geological Survey
Friday, January 5, 2024, 1:47 PM PST (Friday, January 5, 2024, 21:47 UTC)


CASCADE RANGE (VNUM #)
Current Volcano Alert Level: NORMAL
Current Aviation Color Code: GREEN

Activity Update: All volcanoes in the Cascade Range of Oregon and Washington are at normal background activity levels. These include Mount Baker, Glacier Peak, Mount Rainier, Mount St. Helens, and Mount Adams in Washington State and Mount Hood, Mount Jefferson, Three Sisters, Newberry, and Crater Lake in Oregon.

Past Week Observations: During the past week, small earthquakes were detected at Mount Rainier and Mount St. Helens. All monitoring data are consistent with background activity levels in the Cascades Range.



The U.S. Geological Survey Cascades Volcano Observatory and the University of Washington Pacific Northwest Seismic Network continue to monitor Washington and Oregon volcanoes closely and will issue additional notifications as warranted.

Website Resources

For images, graphics, and general information on Cascade Range volcanoes: https://www.usgs.gov/observatories/cvo
For seismic information on Oregon and Washington volcanoes: http://www.pnsn.org/volcanoes
For information on USGS volcano alert levels and notifications: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/VHP/volcano-notifications-deliver-situational-information



CONTACT INFORMATION:

Jon Major, Scientist-in-Charge, Cascades Volcano Observatory, jjmajor@usgs.gov

General inquiries: vhpweb@usgs.gov